
Human-curated rankings, enhanced by AI.
foundations designer
·
product manager
Mar. 2025
CONTEXT
People share opinions on what's best all the time, but nowhere consolidates them into something trustworthy. Existing platforms are either too niche, algorithmically opaque, or locked to a single category. Billionhands was built to turn community taste into something structured, searchable, and shareable.
At Billiohands, I led the design team in crafting the app from scratch. The goal was to create a dynamic platform where users could easily create lists, rank their favorite things, and share opinions on topics they care about.
RESEARCH
Before designing anything, we ran 20+ user interviews to understand how people discover and trust rankings. Three patterns emerged: users distrust rankings with no visible methodology, they want to participate — not just consume — and they share opinions in context (chat, DMs) rather than on dedicated platforms. That shaped every design decision.
At Billiohands, I led the design team in crafting the app from scratch. The goal was to create a dynamic platform where users could easily create lists, rank their favorite things, and share opinions on topics they care about.
24
users interviewed previously
2
2 competing mental models identified

THE APPROACH
We built around a simple loop: create a list → rank with AI assistance → invite community votes → share. The AI layer doesn't replace judgment — it suggests candidates based on category, which users then reorder and trim. This removed the blank-page friction that kills engagement on creation-heavy apps.
4.1x
more engagement on human-curated lists vs. AI-only rankings
MVP OUTCOMES
The MVP shipped with list creation, community voting, and AI-assisted ranking. Early cohort data validated the human-first model.
Early feedback revealed a trust gap with AI-generated rankings: users engaged with them but hesitated to share or endorse them as their own opinion.
Adoption of human-only lists grew fast, and those lists consistently outperformed AI-assisted ones on shares and comments. The AI was useful for reducing the blank-page problem, not for replacing the human voice.
47%
of lists shared externally within 24h of creation




TAKEAWAY
